Women

Formalization of Land Rights in the South: An Overview

Citation:

Sjaastad, Espen, and Ben Cousins. 2008. “Formalization of Land Rights in the South: An Overview.” Land Use Policy 26: 1-9.

Authors: Espen Sjaastad, Ben Cousins

Abstract:

Formalisation of property rights has recently been proposed as a way of reducing poverty. The poor, it is said, do not lack assets, they lack only the formal, protected rights necessary to make these assets engines of entrepreneurship, thriving markets, and information networks. Historical evidence with regard to formalisation programmes is, however, mixed at best, and current universalist proposals contain numerous flaws. A more context-specific and flexible approach is needed, with greater attention to local settings and specific objectives and tools. Property formalisation should not be considered merely a technical tool but must take account of politics and culture.

Keywords: property, land rights, poverty, development, formalization

Topics: Gender, Women, Gendered Power Relations, Gender Equality/Inequality, Rights, Land Rights, Property Rights, Women's Rights Regions: Africa

Year: 2008

Securing Land Rights for Women

Citation:

Daley, Elizabeth, and Birgit Englert. 2010. “Securing Land Rights for Women.” Journal of Eastern African Studies 4 (1): 91-113.

Authors: Elizabeth Daley, Birgit Englert

Abstract:

This collection of papers on Securing Women's Land Rights presents five articles relating to eastern Africa. Four of these illustrate practical approaches to securing land rights for women in distinct situations: law-making for women's land rights (Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda); land tenure reform in practice (Rwanda); women's rights under pastoral land tenure (Ethiopia); and women's rights in areas of matrilineal-matrilocal land tenure (Malawi). This article serves as an overall introduction to the subject, reviewing past issues and highlighting new ones, and setting out the shape of a positive, pragmatic approach to securing women's land rights in eastern Africa. Five key themes emerge: the role of customary institutions; the continuing central role of legislation as a foundation for changing custom; issues of gender equity and equitability, and underlying goals; the challenges of reform implementation and of growing women's confidence to claim their rights; and the importance of encouraging effective collaboration among all those working in the field of women's land rights. The article calls for a stronger focus on gender equity - on securing equal land rights for both women and men - in order to achieve sustainable positive change in broader social and political relations.

 

Keywords: women, land rights, land tenure reform, Gender, gender equity

Annotation:

  • The article provides a comprehensive overview of land policy reforms that have taken place in Eastern Africa over the last two decades, including reforms in Mozambique, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda, Ethiopia, Malawi, Zamia, Kenya and Uganda. It mentions the need to differentiate, not only between the situations in different African countries, but also between the local variations within most countries. It also stresses the need to consider women’s land tenure security in the broadest sense.
  • It confronts the assumption that women’s land rights are always  secondary and “fragile” and suggests that attention must also be paid to the land rights of men.\
  • It also outlines the relatively consistent policies of the World Bank in its 2003 publication of Land Policies for Growth and Development, which: marked a step forward in World Bank thinking on women’s land rights,” (92)
  • Land tenure privatisation is now swinging back to the original straightforward narrowing of customary land rights into private –and, in many cases, corporate –hands. The article reviews key land tenure thinkers of past decade (i.e. economists De Soto and Collier) and states that regardless of De Soto’s thesis (suggested formally registered property rights open the way to the collateralisation of land assets, providing the basis for the creation of capital), evidence from the ground suggests that small holders show little interest in mortgaging their land; also disputes Collier, stresses connection between women’s land rights and food security.

Quotes:

“women in eastern Africa are not powerless actors but find creative means to claim and ensure their rights to land.”(104)

“increasing individualization and commoditization of land rights has occurred and private rights of use and occupancy within customary tenure have become increasingly the norm” (94)

“by no means are all women losing out from the increasing commoditisation of land: some manage to take advantage of the opportunities provided by commoditisation to acquire their own land through purchase, while the development of land rental markets creates additional opportunities for women to gain access to land” (94)

“ in many respects the Bank’s ‘‘new’’ land policy remained the same through its emphasis on economic growth as the main justification for land reform and promotion of land titling as a means to make credit available to smallholders the Bank’s former thinking on land.” ( 92)

“particularly [land rights] […]of women among refugee and internally displaced populations and of the women who stay at home while men go off to fight. Humanitarian agencies have only recently begun to grapple with land issues, and the specifics of women’s land rights in immediate post-conflict situations have yet to be seriously addressed.”(94)

“commoditisation, economic and rural-urban change, conflict (and post-conflict reconstruction and reconciliation), the spread of HIV/AIDS, and the increasing ‘‘privatization’’ of land tenure” (92)

"Impact of privitization: twentieth century in eastern Africa by land tenure reforms which introduced land registration on the basis of formal survey in the pursuit of agricultural development, commencing in Kenya in 1954.24 This private registration of land  the narrowing of broad customary rights to ownership rights (title) in the hands of a single (usually male) person  became the dominant approach to African land law and administration, despite numerous criticisms of its effectiveness in achieving its goals, and of its negative impact on marginalising women’s rights." (94)

“the importance of land markets and individual tenure as the essential ingredients for agricultural productivity and growth’’ (94)

"Gender issues are of course intimately bound up in struggles over power and authority, particularly in relation to land." (97)

“Peters thus fears that equal inheritance combined with future land ownership registration and the practice of men being considered as the head of the household will lead to serious reductions in land tenure security for a great many women in the matrilineal-matrilocal areas of southern Malawi, while simultaneously acknowledging that gains may come for women in other (patrilineal) areas of Malawi. Peters therefore calls for consideration of alternatives to straightforward land titling programmes in matrilineal areas, and more generally for the pursuit of legal protection and registration of the sorts of overlapping claims to land found in existing customary tenure arrangements.” (103)

The question remains as to whether gender equitable and gender equal legal provisions can actually be implemented in practice” (103)

Topics: Gender, Women, Gendered Power Relations, Gender Equity, Land Tenure, Rights, Land Rights, Women's Rights Regions: Africa, East Africa

Year: 2010

Gender, Property Rights, and Natural Resources

Citation:

Meinzen-Dick, Ruth, Lynn Brown, Hilary Sims Feldstein, and Agnes Quisumbing. 1997. “Gender, Property Rights and Natural Resources.” World Development 25 (8): 1303–15.

Authors: Ruth Meinzen-Dick, Lynn R. Brown, Hilary Sims Feldstein, Agnes R. Quisumbing

Keywords: natural resources, intrahousehold, land tenure, water resources, trees

Annotation:

Summary: 

Attention to gender differences in property rights can improve the outcomes of natural resource management policies and projects in terms of efficiency, environmental sustainability, equity, and empowerment of resource users. Although it is impossible to generalize across cultures and resources, it is important to identify the nature of rights to land, trees and water held by women and men, and how they are acquired and transmitted from one user to another. The paper particularly examines how the shift from customary tenure systems to private property - in land, trees and water - has affected women, the effect of gender differences in property on collective action, and the implications for project design.

Quotes:

“The maximization of one output from a resource, for example fruits, may be in conflict with the maximization of another, for example logs, and thus hard choices may have to be made... there may be gender differentials if, for example, logs are marketed by men and fruits are gathered by women and provide a source of income and/or food” (p. 1305).

“Lastarria-Cornhiel’s paper in this issue points out how the spread of Islam and colonialism have eroded traditions of female inheritance in parts of Africa. But looking narrowly at inheritance patterns for one resource may be misleading. For example, in rural areas of the Philippines, transmission of land to men through inheritance is balanced by favoring the education of girls (Wuisumbing, 1997)” (p. 1308).
 
“The policy implication is that privatization programs need to be designed so that women can obtain title, but this may not be sufficient to allow women to intensify production. That requires access to credit and other inputs in support of resource utilization. Limited access to markets, credit, and inputs may be because they are not there at all; or skewed because of normative or legal gender bias restricting women’s access. This implies a need for complementary programs to provide credit and legal assistance along with appropriately designed rules” (p. 1309).
 
“A related question is whether women are better off by integrating into existing male-dominated groups or in setting up their own groups for resource management (e.g. nurseries, social forestry action, etc.)? Examples from other arenas tend to indicate that the different roles and responsibilities of women can prejudice their ability to integrate successfully in mixed groups” (p. 1311).
 
“Legal systems need to be developed and adapted to assist women in obtaining or protecting their rights. In many cases this requires moving beyond simple ownership, to a recognition of flexible, multiuser tenure arrangement” (p. 1312).

Topics: Economies, Gender, Women, Gender Analysis, Gendered Power Relations, Gender Equity, Land Tenure, Rights, Land Rights, Property Rights, Women's Rights

Year: 1997

Gender-Based Violence and Property Grabbing in Africa: A Denial of Women’s Security and Liberty

Citation:

Izumi, Kaori. 2007.”Gender-Based Violence and Property Grabbing in Africa: A Denial of Women’s Security and Liberty.” Gender and Development 15 (1): 11-23.

Author: Kaori Izumi

Abstract:

Property grabbing is a new form of gendered violence against women, threatening the security of women across Southern and East Africa. Forced evictions are often accompanied by further acts of violence, including physical and mental harassment, and abuse. Widows are particularly vulnerable, partly as a result of weakened customary practice and social safety nets that used to provide support to widowed women and their children, a situation made worse by the HIV and AIDS epidemic. Defending their property has cost some women their lives, while other women have lost their shelter and source of livelihoods, and have become destitute. The harassment and humiliation that often accompany property grabbing further strip women of their self-esteem, affecting their ability to defend their rights.

Keywords: gendered violence, insecurity, physical abuse, mental harassment, women's rights, Property grabbing

Topics: Economies, Gender, Women, Gender-Based Violence, Health, HIV/AIDS, Mental Health, Land Grabbing, Rights, Land Rights, Women's Rights, Security, Human Security Regions: Africa, East Africa, Southern Africa

Year: 2007

Women, Wives and Land Rights in Africa: Situating Gender Beyond the Household in the Debate Over Land Policy and Changing Tenure Systems

Citation:

Yngstrom, Ingrid. 2002. “Women, Wives and Land Rights in Africa: Situating Gender Beyond the Household in the Debate Over Land Policy and Changing Tenure Systems.” Oxford Development Studies 31 (1): 21-40.

Author: Ingrid Yngstrom

Abstract:

The debate over land reform in Africa is embedded in evolutionary models, in which it is assumed landholding systems are evolving into individualized systems of ownership with greater market integration. This process is seen to be occurring even without state protection of private land rights through titling. Gender as an analytical category is excluded in evolutionary models. Women are accommodated only in their dependent position as the wives of landholders in idealized ‘households’. This paper argues that gender relations are central to the organization and transformation of landholding systems. Women have faced different forms of tenure insecurity, both as wives and in their relations with wider kin, as landholding systems have been integrated into wider markets. These cannot be addressed while evolutionary models dominate the policy debate. The paper draws out these arguments from experience of tenure reform in Tanzania and asks how policy-makers might address these issues differently.

Topics: Gender, Women, Land Tenure, Political Economies, Rights, Land Rights Regions: Africa, East Africa Countries: Tanzania

Year: 2002

Land Rights, Gender Equality and Household Food Security: Exploring the Conceptual Links in the Case of India

Citation:

Rao, Nitya. 2006. “Land Rights, Gender Equality and Household Food Security: Exploring the Conceptual Links in the Case of India." Food Policy 31: 180-193.

Author: Nitya Rao

Abstract:

This paper seeks to critically examine the conceptual linkages between the issue of land rights for women, with household food security on the one hand and gender equality on the other. After a brief analysis of shifts in both international and national policy discourse and practice in terms of control over land as vital for food security, it seeks to analyse the implications of this for gender relations. The paper argues that in a context of diversified rural livelihoods, the contribution of agricultural production to household subsistence has been declining. This trend has been reinforced by a decline in public investment, stagnant growth and fluctuating prices for agricultural products. Men have been able to access the better paid, non-farm jobs, while leaving women behind to manage agricultural production. The renewed link between production and food security in agricultural policy has however meant allowing men not to have responsibility for household food security. While a right to land for women is a positive development, it appears also to be leading to an enhancement of work burdens, without much change in terms of status or decision-making authority.

Keywords: gender equality, land rights, household food security, gender relations, agricultural policies

Topics: Agriculture, Economies, Food Security, Gender, Women, Men, Gendered Power Relations, Gender Equality/Inequality, Households, Livelihoods, Rights, Land Rights, Women's Rights, Security Regions: Asia, South Asia Countries: India

Year: 2006

Women and Land Tenure in Southern Africa: A Human Rights-Based Approach

Citation:

Mutangadura, Gladys. 2004. “Women and Land Tenure in Southern Africa: A Human Rights-Based Approach.” Paper prepared for Session Two: Gender, Land Rights and Inheritance, Church House, Westminister, London, United Kingdom, November 8-9.

Author: Gladys Mutangadura

Abstract:

Land is considered the most fundamental resource to women's living conditions, economic empowerment and, to some extent, their struggle for equity and equality. More than 60% percent of women in Southern Africa are dependent on land for their livelihoods. Despite the importance of land to women in the sub-region, their land rights are still largely discriminated against. A combination of statutory and customary laws favoring male ownership of property disadvantage women's rights to own land. The traditional exclusion of women from property and land ownership on gender grounds is the most damaging global human rights violation experienced in many developing countries. Without rights to land, women's economic and physical security is compromised. Using evidence from selected countries in Southern Africa, this paper uses a human rights approach to argue that women's equality and land rights are violated if their rights to land are not honored. The paper offers recommendations on strategies that can be adopted by countries to enable women to equitably access, own and control land.

Topics: Gender, Women, Gendered Power Relations, Gender Equality/Inequality, Gender Equity, Land Tenure, Livelihoods, Rights, Human Rights, Land Rights, Property Rights, Women's Rights Regions: Africa, Southern Africa

Year: 2004

Justice and Power in the Adjudication of Women’s Property Rights in Uganda

Citation:

Khadiagala, Lynn S. 2003. “Justice and Power in the Adjudication of Women’s Property Rights in Uganda.” Africa Today 49 (2): 101-121.

Author: Lynn S. Khadiagala

Abstract:

This article challenges the notion that women who derive their primary rights from land are unable to use the legal system to assert or protect their property rights. Drawing on fieldwork conducted in southern Uganda, I suggest that female legal consciousness and legal strategies cannot be sufficiently explained by a paradigm of male hegemony and female dependence. Instead, women in Kabale District construct land claims around an ethos of justice entailing a quid pro quo between rights and responsibilities. Drawing on the value of their agricultural labor to the household economy, reinforced by the labor intensity of farming in Kabale, women transform property disputes into claims to the basic elements of citizenship, including membership, participation, and universal norms of justice.

Keywords: women's land rights, legal system, Gender

Topics: Citizenship, Gender, Women, Gendered Power Relations, Gender Equality/Inequality, Households, Justice, Rights, Land Rights, Property Rights, Women's Rights Regions: Africa, East Africa Countries: Uganda

Year: 2003

Gender Analysis of Land: Beyond Land Rights for Women?

Citation:

Jackson, Cecile. 2003. “Gender Analysis of Land: Beyond Land Rights for Women?.” Journal of Agrarian Change 3 (4): 453-480.

Author: Cecile Jackson

Abstract:

Gender analysts of development have worked on land and property relations in poor rural areas for over two decades and the JAC 2003 special issue carried a range of work reflecting some of these research trajectories. This article is both a response to Bina Agarwal's paper on 'Gender and Land Rights Revisited', in which she reiterates her advocacy of land rights, and also an argument for why we should temper her transformatory expectations, recognize the complexity of what she sees as 'social obstacles' to women claiming land, and not rush to policy closure on land rights in all circumstances, or to blanket prescriptions. It argues for a renewed emphasis on reflexive ethnographic research with a focus on gender as social relations, on subject positions and subjectivities, on the meshing of shared and separate interests within households and on power residing in discourse as well as material assets.

Keywords: Gender, land, property, development

Topics: Gender, Women, Gendered Power Relations, Rights, Land Rights, Property Rights, Women's Rights

Year: 2003

The Impact of Privatization on Gender and Property Rights in Africa

Citation:

Lastarria-Cornhiel, Susana. 1997. “The Impact of Privatization on Gender and Property Rights in Africa.” World Development 25 (8): 1317-33.

Author: Susana Lastarria-Cornhiel

Abstract:

This paper explores the transformation of customary tenure systems and their impact on women's rights to land in Africa. Emphasis is placed on the diversity of land rights within customary tenure systems, the different institutions and structures (e.g., inheritance, marriage) that influence rights to land, and the trend toward uniformity and increasing patrilineal control. With privatization, different rights to land have become concentrated in the hands of those persons (such as community leaders, male household heads) who are able to successfully claim their ownership right to land, while other persons (such as poor rural women, ethnic minorities) lose the few rights they had and generally are not able to participate fully in the land market. 

Keywords: privatization, women's land rights, ownership to land, Gender, customary law

Topics: Gender, Women, Gendered Power Relations, Patriarchy, Land Tenure, Rights, Land Rights, Property Rights, Women's Rights Regions: Africa

Year: 1997

Pages

© 2024 CONSORTIUM ON GENDER, SECURITY & HUMAN RIGHTSLEGAL STATEMENT All photographs used on this site, and any materials posted on it, are the property of their respective owners, and are used by permission. Photographs: The images used on the site may not be downloaded, used, or reproduced in any way without the permission of the owner of the image. Materials: Visitors to the site are welcome to peruse the materials posted for their own research or for educational purposes. These materials, whether the property of the Consortium or of another, may only be reproduced with the permission of the owner of the material. This website contains copyrighted materials. The Consortium believes that any use of copyrighted material on this site is both permissive and in accordance with the Fair Use doctrine of 17 U.S.C. § 107. If, however, you believe that your intellectual property rights have been violated, please contact the Consortium at info@genderandsecurity.org.

Subscribe to RSS - Women