International Tribunals & Special Courts

The Special Court for Sierra Leone’s Consideration of Gender-based Violence: Contributing to Transitional Justice?

Citation:

Oosterveld, Valerie. 2009. “The Special Court for Sierra Leone’s Consideration of Gender-based Violence: Contributing to Transitional Justice?” Human Rights Review 10 (1): 73–98. doi: 10.1007/s12142-008-0098-7.

Author: Valeria Oosterveld

Abstract:

Serious gender-based crimes were committed against women and girls during Sierra Leone’s decade-long armed conflict. This article examines how the Special Court for Sierra Leone has approached these crimes in its first four judgments. The June 20, 2007 trial judgment in the Armed Forces Revolutionary Council case assists international criminal law’s limited understanding of the crime against humanity of forced marriage, but also collapses evidence of that crime into the war crime of outrages upon personal dignity. The February 22, 2008 appeals judgment attempts to correct this misstep. In contrast, the August 2, 2007 trial judgment in the Civil Defence Forces case is virtually silent on crimes committed against women and girls, although the May 28, 2008 appeals judgment attempts to partially redress this silence. This article concludes that the four judgments, considered together, raise the specter that the Special Court could potentially fail to make a significant progressive contribution to gender-sensitive transitional justice.

Topics: Gender, Women, Girls, Gender-Based Violence, International Law, International Criminal Law, Justice, Crimes against Humanity, International Tribunals & Special Courts, Transitional Justice, Post-Conflict Regions: Africa, West Africa Countries: Sierra Leone

Year: 2009

Sexual Offenses in Armed Conflict & International Law

Citation:

Quénivet, Noëlle. 2005. Sexual Offenses in Armed Conflict & International Law. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.

Author: Noëlle Quénivet

Abstract:

In Sexual Offenses in Armed Conflict & International Law, Noelle Quenivet looks to compare feminist writing with the current state of international law, regarding sexual offenses during times of conflict. She presents results of extensive research into the field's burgeoning literature to present her arguments. She furthers her arguments by examining International Criminal Tribunals for the atrocities committed in the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda.

Topics: Armed Conflict, Gender-Based Violence, International Law, International Criminal Law, Justice, International Tribunals & Special Courts, Sexual Violence Regions: Africa, Central Africa, East Africa, Europe, Balkans Countries: Rwanda, Yugoslavia (former)

Year: 2005

From the Furies of the Nanking to the Eumenides of the International Criminal Court; The Evolution of Sexual Assaults as International Crimes

Citation:

Ryan, Samantha I. 1999. “From the Furies of the Nanking to the Eumenides of the International Criminal Court; The Evolution of Sexual Assaults as International Crimes.” Pace International Law Review 11 (2): 446–86.

Author: Samantha I. Ryan

Topics: Gender-Based Violence, International Law, International Criminal Law, Justice, International Tribunals & Special Courts, Sexual Violence

Year: 1999

The Importance of Effective Investigation of Sexual Violence and Gender-Based Crimes at the International Criminal Court

Citation:

SáCouto, Susana, and Katherine Cleary. 2009. “The Importance of Effective Investigation of Sexual Violence and Gender-Based Crimes at the International Criminal Court.” American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law 17 (2): 339–59.

Authors: Susana SáCouto, Katherine Cleary

Topics: Gender-Based Violence, International Law, International Criminal Law, Justice, International Tribunals & Special Courts, Sexual Violence

Year: 2009

The Trauma of Justice: Sexual Violence, Crimes Against Humanity and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Citation:

Campbell, Kirsten. 2004. “The Trauma of Justice: Sexual Violence, Crimes Against Humanity and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.” Social & Legal Studies 13 (3): 329–50.

Author: Kirsten Campbell

Abstract:

This article explores the relationship between the concepts of trauma and justice in the jurisprudence of crimes against humanity of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, focusing upon cases of sexual violence. It argues that the Tribunal’s jurisprudence conceives this crime as a traumatic violation of both the subject of rights and of universal humanity. The Tribunal’s models of international justice as procedure, punishment, recognition and therapy understand justice as the legal suturing of this trauma. In these models, the notion of ‘justice’ functions as phantasy in the psychoanalytic sense of an imaginary scene that veils its impossibility. However, figuring international justice as the resolution of the trauma of crimes against humanity reiterates the traumatic wrong in humanitarian law. Humanitarian law therefore requires a new model of international justice - a model that does not reiterate the past but which can institute the future.

Topics: Health, Trauma, International Law, International Humanitarian Law (IHL), Justice, Crimes against Humanity, International Tribunals & Special Courts, Sexual Violence Regions: Europe, Balkans Countries: Yugoslavia (former)

Year: 2004

Radical Rules: The Effects of Evidential and Procedural Rules on the Regulation of Sexual Violence in War

Citation:

Ní Aoláin, Fionnuala. 1997. “Radical Rules: The Effects of Evidential and Procedural Rules on the Regulation of Sexual Violence in War.” Albany Law Review 60: 883–905.

Author: Fionnuala Ní Aoláin

Topics: Armed Conflict, International Law, Justice, International Tribunals & Special Courts, War Crimes, Sexual Violence Regions: Balkans Countries: Yugoslavia (former)

Year: 1997

Paper Protection Mechanisms: Child Soldiers and the International Protection of Children in Africa’s Conflict Zones

Citation:

Francis, David J. 2007. “Paper Protection Mechanisms : Child Soldiers and the International Protection of Children in Africa’s Conflict Zones.” Journal of Modern African Studies 45 (2): 207–31.

Author: David J. Francis

Abstract:

The arrest and prosecution in March 2006 of the former Liberian warlord-President Charles Taylor by the UN-backed Special Court for Sierra Leone, for war crimes including the recruitment and use of child soldiers, and the arrest and prosecution of the Congolese warlord, Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, by the International Criminal Court, accused of enlisting child soldiers in the DRC war, have raised expectations that finally international conventions and customary international laws protecting children in conflict zones will now have enforcement powers. But why has it taken so long to protect children in conflict situations despite the volume of international treaties and conventions? What do we know about the phenomenon of child soldiering, and why are children still routinely recruited and used in Africa's bloody wars? This article argues that against the background of unfolding events relating to prosecution for enlistment of child soldiers, the international community is beginning to wake up to the challenge of enforcing its numerous 'paper protection' instruments for the protection of children. However, a range of challenges still pose serious threats to the implementation and enforcement of the international conventions protecting children. Extensive research fieldwork in Liberia and Sierra Leone over three years reveals that the application of the restrictive and Western-centric definition and construction of a 'child' and 'childhood' raises inherent difficulties in the African context. In addition, most war-torn and post-conflict African societies are faced with the challenge of incorporating international customary laws into their domestic laws. The failure of the international community to enforce its standards on child soldiers also has to do with the politics of ratification of international treaties, in particular the fear by African governments of setting dangerous precedents, since they are also culpable of recruitment and use of child soldiers.

Topics: Armed Conflict, Combatants, Child Soldiers, Gender, International Law, International Criminal Law, International Organizations, Justice, International Tribunals & Special Courts, War Crimes, Post-Conflict Regions: Africa

Year: 2007

Women, War, and Words: The Gender Component in the Permanent International Criminal Court’s Definition of Crimes Against Humanity

Citation:

Moshan, B. S. 1998. “Women, War, and Words: The Gender Component in the Permanent International Criminal Court’s Definition of Crimes Against Humanity.” Fordham International Law Journal 22: 154–84.

Author: B. S. Moshan

Abstract:

This Comment addresses the intersection of gender issues and human rights law as illustrated by the formation of the permanent ICC. Specifically, it argues that the inclusion of gender- motivated crimes in the ICC's definition of crimes against humanity was necessary to emphasize women's wartime experiences and injuries, but that such inclusion is not enough to ensure gender justice as the ICC begins to prosecute war crimes and crimes against humanity. Part I of this Comment discusses the concept of gender-based crimes and illustrates these crimes through recent examples of gender-based violence. It also reviews the history of the ICC, focusing on the events leading up to the Rome Conference and the adoption of the ICC statute. Part II discusses the treatment of gender in the ICC statute. Part III argues that the inclusion of gender-based crimes in the definition of crimes against humanity in the ICC statute is a victory for women's rights, but that the Rome Statute fails to address some of the most essential concerns of women's rights advocates. This Comment concludes that the Rome Statute is ultimately only a partial victory for gender justice.

Topics: Gender, Gender-Based Violence, International Law, International Criminal Law, International Human Rights, Justice, Crimes against Humanity, International Tribunals & Special Courts, Rights, Women's Rights

Year: 1998

Pages

© 2024 CONSORTIUM ON GENDER, SECURITY & HUMAN RIGHTSLEGAL STATEMENT All photographs used on this site, and any materials posted on it, are the property of their respective owners, and are used by permission. Photographs: The images used on the site may not be downloaded, used, or reproduced in any way without the permission of the owner of the image. Materials: Visitors to the site are welcome to peruse the materials posted for their own research or for educational purposes. These materials, whether the property of the Consortium or of another, may only be reproduced with the permission of the owner of the material. This website contains copyrighted materials. The Consortium believes that any use of copyrighted material on this site is both permissive and in accordance with the Fair Use doctrine of 17 U.S.C. § 107. If, however, you believe that your intellectual property rights have been violated, please contact the Consortium at info@genderandsecurity.org.

Subscribe to RSS - International Tribunals & Special Courts